http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/05/27/two-kids-in-a-garage-make-invalidate-varneys-concerns/ Computer Science meets Social Science Thu, 24 May 2012 21:39:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/05/27/two-kids-in-a-garage-make-invalidate-varneys-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-484 Google: Target for Destruction?- The SiliconANGLE Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:47:26 +0000 http://www.siliconangle.com/ver2/?p=5179#comment-484 [...] what our take was on this situation back in May (more on what’s changed and what Wired said in a minute): This is certainly a reason for concern. [...] [...] what our take was on this situation back in May (more on what’s changed and what Wired said in a minute): This is certainly a reason for concern. [...]

]]> http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/05/27/two-kids-in-a-garage-make-invalidate-varneys-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-168 Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins Thu, 28 May 2009 17:07:28 +0000 http://www.siliconangle.com/ver2/?p=5179#comment-168 I definitely agree - the way she targets them is very disconcerting. It isn't based in logic or current definition of anti-competitive practice. I definitely agree – the way she targets them is very disconcerting. It isn't based in logic or current definition of anti-competitive practice.

]]> http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/05/27/two-kids-in-a-garage-make-invalidate-varneys-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-170 Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins Thu, 28 May 2009 17:06:28 +0000 http://www.siliconangle.com/ver2/?p=5179#comment-170 Thanks! Thanks!

]]> http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/05/27/two-kids-in-a-garage-make-invalidate-varneys-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-169 JJ Thu, 28 May 2009 03:29:51 +0000 http://www.siliconangle.com/ver2/?p=5179#comment-169 Great article Great article

]]> http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/05/27/two-kids-in-a-garage-make-invalidate-varneys-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-167 wattersj Wed, 27 May 2009 22:32:12 +0000 http://www.siliconangle.com/ver2/?p=5179#comment-167 Unfortunately everyone wants to do the 'big thing' in their role in life esp if it matches their ideology; so her big game to hunt is crazily Google; sadly it seems her ideology of 'big powerful companies with high market share are evil!' is more the selection heuristic here than any blockage of innovation because of their size. The latter is the issue they argue, but the former the reason why. Unfortunately everyone wants to do the 'big thing' in their role in life esp if it matches their ideology; so her big game to hunt is crazily Google; sadly it seems her ideology of 'big powerful companies with high market share are evil!' is more the selection heuristic here than any blockage of innovation because of their size. The latter is the issue they argue, but the former the reason why.

]]>