<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How AT&amp;T could be the backbone infrastructure for the mobile web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/07/12/how-att-could-be-the-backbone-infrastructure-for-the-mobile-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/07/12/how-att-could-be-the-backbone-infrastructure-for-the-mobile-web/</link>
	<description>Just another Siliconangle.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 02:23:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Furrier</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/07/12/how-att-could-be-the-backbone-infrastructure-for-the-mobile-web/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>John Furrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.com/ver2/?p=6525#comment-393</guid>
		<description>Vadim Kilshteyn &lt;br&gt;I believe that T-Mobile is the next major carrier that will trump AT&amp;T and Verizon Wireless as Google is going with them... Especially with a Google Voice and Google OS, T-Mobile will get a lot more exposure, plus very competitively priced in comparison to over-priced AT&amp;T...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anton Wahlman &lt;br&gt;Android will find itself on every single carrier soon enough, not only T-Mobile. That said, it is true T-Mobile is cheaper than Verizon and AT&amp;T. But so is Sprint -- and MetroPCS is even cheaper. I love T-Mobile, but the biggest advantage currently in possession by Verizon and AT&amp;T is that each of them have purchased nationwide or near-... Read Morenationwide spectrum (some 20 MHz each) situated just above 700 MHz. Verizon launches significantly December 2010 and AT&amp;T a year thereafter. How do T-Mobile and Sprint compete with that?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anton Wahlman &lt;br&gt;By the way, just one statistic alone: For the last few reported quarters (up through March 2009), the #1 selling smartphone in the US is the Blackberry Curve -- not the iPhone. Actually, 3 of the top 5 best-selling smartphones in the US were Blackberry. Lord knows if the June 2009 numbers hold up the same way, but it&#039;s probably now off by much. That said, Blackberry launches most of its new models in July-November, unlike some of its competitors, who are on June schedules.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Paul Kapustka &lt;br&gt;This post doesn&#039;t even begin to answer a very pertinent question -- where would AT&amp;T get the spectrum needed to make such services available?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anton Wahlman&lt;br&gt;The only known spectrum expansion on the horizon for AT&amp;T is the 20 MHz of which it just took possession approximately one month ago, and where it has said it intends to launch LTE service by about December 2011. 20 MHz situated just North of 700 MHz isn&#039;t much, but it beats nothing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vadim Kilshteyn <br />I believe that T-Mobile is the next major carrier that will trump AT&#038;T and Verizon Wireless as Google is going with them... Especially with a Google Voice and Google OS, T-Mobile will get a lot more exposure, plus very competitively priced in comparison to over-priced AT&#038;T...</p>
<p>Anton Wahlman <br />Android will find itself on every single carrier soon enough, not only T-Mobile. That said, it is true T-Mobile is cheaper than Verizon and AT&#038;T. But so is Sprint -- and MetroPCS is even cheaper. I love T-Mobile, but the biggest advantage currently in possession by Verizon and AT&#038;T is that each of them have purchased nationwide or near-... Read Morenationwide spectrum (some 20 MHz each) situated just above 700 MHz. Verizon launches significantly December 2010 and AT&#038;T a year thereafter. How do T-Mobile and Sprint compete with that?</p>
<p>Anton Wahlman <br />By the way, just one statistic alone: For the last few reported quarters (up through March 2009), the #1 selling smartphone in the US is the Blackberry Curve -- not the iPhone. Actually, 3 of the top 5 best-selling smartphones in the US were Blackberry. Lord knows if the June 2009 numbers hold up the same way, but it&#39;s probably now off by much. That said, Blackberry launches most of its new models in July-November, unlike some of its competitors, who are on June schedules.</p>
<p>Paul Kapustka <br />This post doesn&#39;t even begin to answer a very pertinent question -- where would AT&#038;T get the spectrum needed to make such services available?</p>
<p>Anton Wahlman<br />The only known spectrum expansion on the horizon for AT&#038;T is the 20 MHz of which it just took possession approximately one month ago, and where it has said it intends to launch LTE service by about December 2011. 20 MHz situated just North of 700 MHz isn&#39;t much, but it beats nothing...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How AT&#38;T could be the backbone infrastructure for the mobile web &#8230;&#160;&#124;&#160;TD Tele Entertainment</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/07/12/how-att-could-be-the-backbone-infrastructure-for-the-mobile-web/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>How AT&#38;T could be the backbone infrastructure for the mobile web &#8230;&#160;&#124;&#160;TD Tele Entertainment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.com/ver2/?p=6525#comment-389</guid>
		<description>[...] See original here: How AT&amp;T could be the backbone infrastructure for the mobile web &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See original here: How AT&amp;T could be the backbone infrastructure for the mobile web &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How AT&#38;T could be the backbone infrastructure for the mobile web &#8230;&#160;&#124;&#160;Cell Mobile Guide</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/07/12/how-att-could-be-the-backbone-infrastructure-for-the-mobile-web/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>How AT&#38;T could be the backbone infrastructure for the mobile web &#8230;&#160;&#124;&#160;Cell Mobile Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.com/ver2/?p=6525#comment-388</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the original post: How AT&amp;T could be the backbone infrastructure for the mobile web &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the original post: How AT&amp;T could be the backbone infrastructure for the mobile web &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
