http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/07/21/google-target-for-destruction/ Just another Siliconangle.com weblog Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:58:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/07/21/google-target-for-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-760 US CIO Vivek Kundra is the Tip of the Iceberg- The SiliconANGLE Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:18:52 +0000 http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/07/21/google-target-for-destruction/#comment-760 [...] Christine Varney’s quixotic quest to end Google. [...] [...] Christine Varney’s quixotic quest to end Google. [...]

]]> http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/07/21/google-target-for-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-499 Google: Target for Destruction?- The SiliconANGLE | Technology News Update Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:46:55 +0000 http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/07/21/google-target-for-destruction/#comment-499 [...] See the original post: Google: Target for Destruction?- The SiliconANGLE [...] [...] See the original post: Google: Target for Destruction?- The SiliconANGLE [...]

]]> http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/07/21/google-target-for-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-497 Google: Target for Destruction?- The SiliconANGLE Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:00:21 +0000 http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/07/21/google-target-for-destruction/#comment-497 [...] Google: Target for Destruction?- The SiliconANGLE Tags: contribute, here-8230, iphone, marketing, mobile, news, sharing, social, [...] [...] Google: Target for Destruction?- The SiliconANGLE Tags: contribute, here-8230, iphone, marketing, mobile, news, sharing, social, [...]

]]> http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/07/21/google-target-for-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-492 Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:21:30 +0000 http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/07/21/google-target-for-destruction/#comment-492 It's pretty interesting - until you mentioned it, it didn't occur to me that this is the second time in two days we've issued a major correction to something written in a Wired piece. It's pretty interesting - until you mentioned it, it didn't occur to me that this is the second time in two days we've issued a major correction to something written in a Wired piece.

]]> http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/07/21/google-target-for-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-491 Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:20:31 +0000 http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/07/21/google-target-for-destruction/#comment-491 I fall on the lassez fair when it comes to allowing behavioral ad networks. When you follow the motive of Google, which is to serve more relevant ads (because it's more likely to be profitable for them), it makes sense to allow them to do it. Sure, there are evil things that *could* be done, but there's no incentive for them to do it. I fall on the lassez fair when it comes to allowing behavioral ad networks. When you follow the motive of Google, which is to serve more relevant ads (because it's more likely to be profitable for them), it makes sense to allow them to do it. Sure, there are evil things that *could* be done, but there's no incentive for them to do it.

]]> http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/07/21/google-target-for-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-489 John Furrier Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:26:54 +0000 http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/07/21/google-target-for-destruction/#comment-489 Wired wrote a boat load of garbage on this topic.. they must have needed some space on the print edition. I like Wired but this was a #fail for them. Again good to see we can keep Wired "wired-right" when it comes to policy ;-) Wired wrote a boat load of garbage on this topic.. they must have needed some space on the print edition. I like Wired but this was a #fail for them. Again good to see we can keep Wired "wired-right" when it comes to policy

]]> http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/07/21/google-target-for-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-488 kaiyzen Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:19:27 +0000 http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/07/21/google-target-for-destruction/#comment-488 Although I dont think full on anti-trust scrutiny is needed at this stage the Gov't does need to start investigating further into Google's and other's practices around data collection and click fraud. Their hands off approach to date has stage the stage for "self governance" which makes companies only do the bare minimum, if that. Although I dont think full on anti-trust scrutiny is needed at this stage the Gov't does need to start investigating further into Google's and other's practices around data collection and click fraud. Their hands off approach to date has stage the stage for "self governance" which makes companies only do the bare minimum, if that.

]]>