<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bleeding Edge: Scalable Optical Processing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/08/18/bleeding-edge-scalable-optical-processing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/08/18/bleeding-edge-scalable-optical-processing/</link>
	<description>Computer Science meets Social Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 21:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/08/18/bleeding-edge-scalable-optical-processing/comment-page-1/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/08/18/bleeding-edge-scalable-optical-processing/#comment-851</guid>
		<description>Moore&#039;s Law is something of a constant driven by a combination of psychology and market dynamics.  There might be a danger that Moore&#039;s Law doesn&#039;t continue of Intel finally succeeds in thoroughly trouncing AMD, and competition plays a diminished factor in driving their R&amp;D cycle.

Even before Moore&#039;s Law and the Law of Accelerating Returns was codified, it has been statistically true, so if Intel fails to perform by that standard, someone else will. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moore&#8217;s Law is something of a constant driven by a combination of psychology and market dynamics.  There might be a danger that Moore&#8217;s Law doesn&#8217;t continue of Intel finally succeeds in thoroughly trouncing AMD, and competition plays a diminished factor in driving their R&amp;D cycle.</p>
<p>Even before Moore&#8217;s Law and the Law of Accelerating Returns was codified, it has been statistically true, so if Intel fails to perform by that standard, someone else will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/08/18/bleeding-edge-scalable-optical-processing/comment-page-1/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/08/18/bleeding-edge-scalable-optical-processing/#comment-847</guid>
		<description>I am often confused by what Intel is doing with respect to the future of Moore&#039;s Law?  If the world turn in this direction this means that Intel will be at risk.  

What about other processor companies?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am often confused by what Intel is doing with respect to the future of Moore&#8217;s Law?  If the world turn in this direction this means that Intel will be at risk.  </p>
<p>What about other processor companies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 345/346 objects using apc

Served from: siliconangle.com @ 2012-05-24 23:53:13 -->
