<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Has Failed the Initial Integrity Litmus Test. Will They Establish a Pattern of Cowardice?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/08/31/google-has-failed-the-initial-integrity-litmus-test-will-they-establish-a-pattern-of-cowardice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/08/31/google-has-failed-the-initial-integrity-litmus-test-will-they-establish-a-pattern-of-cowardice/</link>
	<description>Computer Science meets Social Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:10:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconANGLE &#8212; Blog &#8212; So We&#8217;re All Supposed to Believe Google Finally Developed a Conscience? [The Dissenting Opinion]</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/08/31/google-has-failed-the-initial-integrity-litmus-test-will-they-establish-a-pattern-of-cowardice/comment-page-1/#comment-11832</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconANGLE &#8212; Blog &#8212; So We&#8217;re All Supposed to Believe Google Finally Developed a Conscience? [The Dissenting Opinion]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/08/31/google-has-failed-the-initial-integrity-litmus-test-will-they-establish-a-pattern-of-cowardice/#comment-11832</guid>
		<description>[...] protecting the identities of their users. When I saw them cavalierly turning over identities of lowly blog commenters to lower courts and caving to inconsequential governments like Egypt’s demands [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] protecting the identities of their users. When I saw them cavalierly turning over identities of lowly blog commenters to lower courts and caving to inconsequential governments like Egypt’s demands [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is there a Google Privacy Policy double &#8230; &#171; /SAbackchan</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/08/31/google-has-failed-the-initial-integrity-litmus-test-will-they-establish-a-pattern-of-cowardice/comment-page-1/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>Is there a Google Privacy Policy double &#8230; &#171; /SAbackchan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/08/31/google-has-failed-the-initial-integrity-litmus-test-will-they-establish-a-pattern-of-cowardice/#comment-994</guid>
		<description>[...] Searchengineland has the same questions I did. (http://siliconangle.net/ver2/2009/08/31/google-has-failed-the-initial-integrity-litmus-test-will-the...) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Searchengineland has the same questions I did. (<a href="http://siliconangle.net/ver2/2009/08/31/google-has-failed-the-initial-integrity-litmus-test-will-the.." rel="nofollow">http://siliconangle.net/ver2/2009/08/31/google-has-failed-the-initial-integrity-litmus-test-will-the..</a>.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

