<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco: Evil Genius or Just Plain Evil? [Cisco-Starent Acquisition]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/</link>
	<description>Computer Science meets Social Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:01:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Broken Promises And Now Cisco Having Big Product Problems &#8211; Network World Points Out Cisco Can&#8217;t Deliver &#124; SiliconANGLE</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-38060</link>
		<dc:creator>Broken Promises And Now Cisco Having Big Product Problems &#8211; Network World Points Out Cisco Can&#8217;t Deliver &#124; SiliconANGLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 08:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.net/ver2/?p=8644#comment-38060</guid>
		<description>[...] is big trouble for Cisco as they are taking on the most ambitious market take down in their company [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is big trouble for Cisco as they are taking on the most ambitious market take down in their company [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconANGLE &#8212; Blog &#8212; Mobile News: Juniper Getting Stronger In Mobile - Research Validates The Market</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-13107</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconANGLE &#8212; Blog &#8212; Mobile News: Juniper Getting Stronger In Mobile - Research Validates The Market</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.net/ver2/?p=8644#comment-13107</guid>
		<description>[...] News was broke by the Wall Street Journal yesterday that Juniper is announcing will begin selling new wireless products for mobile carriers, responding to bigger rival Cisco Systems recent acquisition of Starent - of which I was critical. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] News was broke by the Wall Street Journal yesterday that Juniper is announcing will begin selling new wireless products for mobile carriers, responding to bigger rival Cisco Systems recent acquisition of Starent &#8211; of which I was critical. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconANGLE &#8212; Blog &#8212; Cisco The Apple of Networking? NOT - The Polycom Juniper Partnership Implications</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-12282</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconANGLE &#8212; Blog &#8212; Cisco The Apple of Networking? NOT - The Polycom Juniper Partnership Implications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.net/ver2/?p=8644#comment-12282</guid>
		<description>[...] Differences: Open or Closed I wrote about Cisco&#039;s strategy here regarding their growth plans with respect to the Starent buy. Similar here with Cisco buying Tandberg. With these two [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Differences: Open or Closed I wrote about Cisco&#39;s strategy here regarding their growth plans with respect to the Starent buy. Similar here with Cisco buying Tandberg. With these two [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rackspace Takes Page Out of the Old Microsoft&#8217;s Playbook &#8211; Partner Don&#8217;t Kill Ecosystem Players &#171; The SiliconANGLE</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-9961</link>
		<dc:creator>Rackspace Takes Page Out of the Old Microsoft&#8217;s Playbook &#8211; Partner Don&#8217;t Kill Ecosystem Players &#171; The SiliconANGLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.net/ver2/?p=8644#comment-9961</guid>
		<description>[...] Rackspace business deal in essence saves FathomDB and ensures a healthy opportunity to add value. This is the big story and one that I&#8217;m focused on in other areas &#8211; Cisco in particular of late.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rackspace business deal in essence saves FathomDB and ensures a healthy opportunity to add value. This is the big story and one that I&#8217;m focused on in other areas &#8211; Cisco in particular of late.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco Juniper War &#8211; Juniper Networks Launches New Strategy &#171; The SiliconANGLE</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-3433</link>
		<dc:creator>Cisco Juniper War &#8211; Juniper Networks Launches New Strategy &#171; The SiliconANGLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.net/ver2/?p=8644#comment-3433</guid>
		<description>[...] http://siliconangle.net/ver2/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://siliconangle.net/ver2/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/" rel="nofollow">http://siliconangle.net/ver2/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cisco Under Investigation on Stargent Bu&#8230; &#171; /SAbackchan</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-3378</link>
		<dc:creator>Cisco Under Investigation on Stargent Bu&#8230; &#171; /SAbackchan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.net/ver2/?p=8644#comment-3378</guid>
		<description>[...] http://siliconangle.net/ver2/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://siliconangle.net/ver2/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/" rel="nofollow">http://siliconangle.net/ver2/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is: &#8220;Cloud Ready?&#8221; &#171; The SiliconANGLE</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-3365</link>
		<dc:creator>What is: &#8220;Cloud Ready?&#8221; &#171; The SiliconANGLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.net/ver2/?p=8644#comment-3365</guid>
		<description>[...] The &quot;Cloud Ready&quot; movement is very important for infrastructure, platforms, and applications to converge across all networks.&#160; Although important and relevant, it&#8217;s early.&#160; The vendors that are open and innovative will win.&#160; The wildcard variable in all of this &#8211; the role &quot;open source&quot; plays.&#160; The maturation of open source is leveling the playing field.&#160; It&#8217;s opening the market and threatening the market incumbents that have historically been dominating. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The &quot;Cloud Ready&quot; movement is very important for infrastructure, platforms, and applications to converge across all networks.&#160; Although important and relevant, it&#8217;s early.&#160; The vendors that are open and innovative will win.&#160; The wildcard variable in all of this &#8211; the role &quot;open source&quot; plays.&#160; The maturation of open source is leveling the playing field.&#160; It&#8217;s opening the market and threatening the market incumbents that have historically been dominating. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The siliconANGLE Weekly: Top Posts for the Week &#8211; Readers Choice &#171; The SiliconANGLE</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-2128</link>
		<dc:creator>The siliconANGLE Weekly: Top Posts for the Week &#8211; Readers Choice &#171; The SiliconANGLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.net/ver2/?p=8644#comment-2128</guid>
		<description>[...] John Furrier Cisco: Evil Genius or Just Plain Evil? [Cisco-Starent Acquisition]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Furrier Cisco: Evil Genius or Just Plain Evil? [Cisco-Starent Acquisition]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Camp</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-2084</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Camp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.net/ver2/?p=8644#comment-2084</guid>
		<description>I agree about the cowboy days, but I think there was a shift from cowboy to robber baron at some point. If I had to pick when, I&#039;d suggest either when Nortel acquired Bay Networks or at the big VoIP push when Cisco acquired Centillion. From that point on, I don&#039;t feel like they really even made a serious effort at R&amp;D or real innovation.

I&#039;m not a fan of this deal either. I think it will turn out to be bad for investors and bad for the industry. And I think it&#039;s the bell tolling for a close look at monopolistic practices in a new way for them.

As to innovation, I think you and I agree. You said &quot;letting partners introduce new technology and innovations independently would hurt Cisco’s operating margins – and they can’t afford to let that happen.&quot; That sounds like protectionism of the status quo and a complete disregard for real effort at innovation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about the cowboy days, but I think there was a shift from cowboy to robber baron at some point. If I had to pick when, I&#8217;d suggest either when Nortel acquired Bay Networks or at the big VoIP push when Cisco acquired Centillion. From that point on, I don&#8217;t feel like they really even made a serious effort at R&amp;D or real innovation.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of this deal either. I think it will turn out to be bad for investors and bad for the industry. And I think it&#8217;s the bell tolling for a close look at monopolistic practices in a new way for them.</p>
<p>As to innovation, I think you and I agree. You said &#8220;letting partners introduce new technology and innovations independently would hurt Cisco’s operating margins – and they can’t afford to let that happen.&#8221; That sounds like protectionism of the status quo and a complete disregard for real effort at innovation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean P. Aune</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2009/10/14/is-cisco-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean P. Aune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.net/ver2/?p=8644#comment-2083</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never gotten a &quot;warm and fuzzy&quot; feeling from Cisco even when they have tried selling me solutions.  It has always been a, &quot;Hey, we&#039;re Cisco, you know you want us&quot;-type vibe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never gotten a &#8220;warm and fuzzy&#8221; feeling from Cisco even when they have tried selling me solutions.  It has always been a, &#8220;Hey, we&#8217;re Cisco, you know you want us&#8221;-type vibe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 513/514 objects using apc

Served from: siliconangle.com @ 2012-05-25 00:56:26 -->
