<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Mobile Networks Melting? Growth Puts Massive Pressure on Carriers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://siliconangle.com/blog/2010/02/06/are-mobile-networks-melting-growth-puts-massive-pressure-on-carriers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2010/02/06/are-mobile-networks-melting-growth-puts-massive-pressure-on-carriers/</link>
	<description>Computer Science meets Social Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:01:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconANGLE &#8212; Blog &#8212; Mobile US Marketshare For December - Numbers Released by Comscore</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2010/02/06/are-mobile-networks-melting-growth-puts-massive-pressure-on-carriers/comment-page-1/#comment-13128</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconANGLE &#8212; Blog &#8212; Mobile US Marketshare For December - Numbers Released by Comscore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.com/?p=13091#comment-13128</guid>
		<description>[...] the mobile smartphone area.  Rich media and full web access is putting strain on mobile networks - they might just be melting under the pressure.  This is why what Juniper Networks, Cisco Systems, and others do and launch as products is very [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the mobile smartphone area.  Rich media and full web access is putting strain on mobile networks &#8211; they might just be melting under the pressure.  This is why what Juniper Networks, Cisco Systems, and others do and launch as products is very [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconANGLE &#8212; Blog &#8212; Mobile News: Juniper Getting Stronger In Mobile - Research Validates The Market</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2010/02/06/are-mobile-networks-melting-growth-puts-massive-pressure-on-carriers/comment-page-1/#comment-13112</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconANGLE &#8212; Blog &#8212; Mobile News: Juniper Getting Stronger In Mobile - Research Validates The Market</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.com/?p=13091#comment-13112</guid>
		<description>[...] now looks like mobile continues to be hot! Just this past weekend I wrote a story about the Mobile Meltdown. This market is so hot that I believe that we might just be heading for a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now looks like mobile continues to be hot! Just this past weekend I wrote a story about the Mobile Meltdown. This market is so hot that I believe that we might just be heading for a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan W.</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2010/02/06/are-mobile-networks-melting-growth-puts-massive-pressure-on-carriers/comment-page-1/#comment-13027</link>
		<dc:creator>alan W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.com/?p=13091#comment-13027</guid>
		<description>It would be disservice to the readership to place myself in the expert&#039;s chair. In other words, I can criticize you, John, but I cant write an authoritative article. My time in the RF SMR business was in 89-92, but I still attend some professional training and read up. 

How about it wireless engineers? Where is the weak link? RF Site survey&#039;s?  Channel overloading?, Multipath? Improper Band Plan for the terrain? Step us guys! It cant all be back haul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be disservice to the readership to place myself in the expert&#8217;s chair. In other words, I can criticize you, John, but I cant write an authoritative article. My time in the RF SMR business was in 89-92, but I still attend some professional training and read up. </p>
<p>How about it wireless engineers? Where is the weak link? RF Site survey&#8217;s?  Channel overloading?, Multipath? Improper Band Plan for the terrain? Step us guys! It cant all be back haul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2010/02/06/are-mobile-networks-melting-growth-puts-massive-pressure-on-carriers/comment-page-1/#comment-13026</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.com/?p=13091#comment-13026</guid>
		<description>The inevitable corollary is that flat rate unlimited mobile data is doomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The inevitable corollary is that flat rate unlimited mobile data is doomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Furrier</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2010/02/06/are-mobile-networks-melting-growth-puts-massive-pressure-on-carriers/comment-page-1/#comment-13025</link>
		<dc:creator>John Furrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.com/?p=13091#comment-13025</guid>
		<description>I am not an expert on the issues of how data and voice allocation happens on the RF architecture - I was told by a friend who is so I&#039;m oversimplifying that tech aspect and probably getting it wrong - that being said I am correct on the high level issue of tower capacity - and you are correct in that it&#039;s very complex.  

Alan: i&#039;d love to get your perspective and see if we can get a breakdown on the thesis of &quot;Are Mobile Networks Melting&quot; and look at the entire value chain - antenna, backhaul, network, server ..etc 

I a writing this post to understand deeper the issues.  I am well versed on RF coverae and networking and server but this entire equatioon is complex.  Can you expand on a post?  Do you think the mobile nets are melting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not an expert on the issues of how data and voice allocation happens on the RF architecture &#8211; I was told by a friend who is so I&#8217;m oversimplifying that tech aspect and probably getting it wrong &#8211; that being said I am correct on the high level issue of tower capacity &#8211; and you are correct in that it&#8217;s very complex.  </p>
<p>Alan: i&#8217;d love to get your perspective and see if we can get a breakdown on the thesis of &#8220;Are Mobile Networks Melting&#8221; and look at the entire value chain &#8211; antenna, backhaul, network, server ..etc </p>
<p>I a writing this post to understand deeper the issues.  I am well versed on RF coverae and networking and server but this entire equatioon is complex.  Can you expand on a post?  Do you think the mobile nets are melting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan W.</title>
		<link>http://siliconangle.com/blog/2010/02/06/are-mobile-networks-melting-growth-puts-massive-pressure-on-carriers/comment-page-1/#comment-13024</link>
		<dc:creator>alan W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siliconangle.com/?p=13091#comment-13024</guid>
		<description>John, you are conflating the allocation of RF channels, backhaul, server capacity, and a million other issues. They are not the same. within any slice of spectrum the number of channels is fixed, and the cell re-use is via topographical and RF field surveys. The ratio of voice to data, is I think, flexible in CDMA and not in GSM systems, perhaps a real engineer can weigh in here. I was a cell system tower engineer in the early 90&#039;s, testing and POP was my game. In some systems you can choke down voice QOS to grant more data throughput. Some systems use statistical techniques to re-use silence in the conversations to create more channel capacity.

Dropped calls are an RF and control problem, due to multi path, S/N,  dead spots, etc. The lower frequencies are more robust than the 2+ GHz frequencies in non LOS situations. ETC .

We all want better service, but the tech press and blogs are going to need a tutorial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, you are conflating the allocation of RF channels, backhaul, server capacity, and a million other issues. They are not the same. within any slice of spectrum the number of channels is fixed, and the cell re-use is via topographical and RF field surveys. The ratio of voice to data, is I think, flexible in CDMA and not in GSM systems, perhaps a real engineer can weigh in here. I was a cell system tower engineer in the early 90&#8242;s, testing and POP was my game. In some systems you can choke down voice QOS to grant more data throughput. Some systems use statistical techniques to re-use silence in the conversations to create more channel capacity.</p>
<p>Dropped calls are an RF and control problem, due to multi path, S/N,  dead spots, etc. The lower frequencies are more robust than the 2+ GHz frequencies in non LOS situations. ETC .</p>
<p>We all want better service, but the tech press and blogs are going to need a tutorial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 430/435 objects using apc

Served from: siliconangle.com @ 2012-05-25 04:39:26 -->
