Apple Patents New “Kill Switch” That can cut off your Smartphone from the Net

Apple Patents New “Kill Switch” That can cut off your Smartphone from the Net

There’s been plenty of fuss about Apple and all their patents recently, so how about this one to kick up a controversy?

According to a report in ZDNet, the Cupertino-based company has just patented a newly developed technology that would allow the government and/or police to disable phone cameras and block the transmission of multimedia content from devices, including video, photos and other files, any time the authorities decide they want to.

Essentially, what it means is that the powers that be will be able to access a “kill switch”, cutting off mobile devices from the rest of the net and preventing the documentation of anything they don’t want to be seen or shared.

Apple, which is still defending itself from accusations that it passed private information regarding its customers to the FBI, stresses that the technology would most likely be used to prevent copyright theft, such as in cinemas, or to prevent cheating during school exams, or else to prevent mobile phones from interrupting important business meetings.

But the statement that came with the official patent ventures into far murkier waters, when it goes into detail about the full capability of the technology:

“This policy enforcement capability is useful for a variety of reasons, including for example to disable noise and/or light emanating from wireless devices (such as at a movie theater), for preventing wireless devices from communicating with other wireless devices (such as in academic settings), and for forcing certain electronic devices to enter “sleep mode” when entering a sensitive area.”

It goes on to elaborate on what it means by a ‘sensitive area’ here:

“…the wireless transmission of sensitive information to a remote source in sensitive areas is one example of a threat to security. This sensitive information could be anything from classified government information to questions or answers to an examination administered in an academic setting.”

One of the most immediate fears that should have liberals screaming from the rooftops is that police could make use of the technology during protests, blocking the transmission of recorded content from the area, meaning that acts of police brutality could no longer be documented.

RELATED:  ‘Touch disease’ affecting your iPhone? How to recognize the signs and sort out the issue

There are other fears too – for instance, what would happen if you accidently stumbled into a scene of pandemonium, with rioters trashing the place and police nowhere to be seen, (like the London riots last year), only to find that you can’t even call for help? Or worse, what if there’s a terrorist attack and all of a sudden you’re cut off and unable to contact your loved ones?

The technology works by transmitting an encoded signal to wireless devices, which effectively overrides them, forcing them to disable recording functionality, and cutting them off from the net. Authorities could activate the signal by means of Wi-Fi, GPS, or even over the standard phone line, in order to ‘geo-fence’ a restricted area and cut it off from the world.

Apple may own the patent for the technology, but the decisions to implement the ‘feature’ would not be theirs. Governments, and possibly even network owners and businesses would have the final authority to make these decisions.

Mike Wheatley

Mike Wheatley is a senior staff writer at SiliconANGLE. He loves to write about Big Data and the Internet of Things, and explore how these technologies are evolving and helping businesses to become more agile.

Before joining SiliconANGLE, Mike was an editor at Argophilia Travel News, an occassional contributer to The Epoch Times, and has also dabbled in SEO and social media marketing. He usually bases himself in Bangkok, Thailand, though he can often be found roaming through the jungles or chilling on a beach.

Got a news story or tip? Email


Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.


Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.


  1. oh dear…

  2. I have never liked apple the company, and I dislike them even more now since they won in the US. I still think that jury made the wrong decision, I have seen some of the patents that apple were fighting over; like some roll bounce thingy watevs. but the point is they won in the US and samsung have to pay them $1bn wat do they want? they’re acting like they wanna ban every single samsung product out there. now they wanna ban the s3 which looks nothing like the flipping iphone. Thanks, @Marisha from
    (AC/DC Adapters)

  3. I can see this being a good idea but only if Apple opens it up to everyone, effectively standardising it for the rest of the world like they were supposed to be doing for FaceTime. Apples services are great but suck in some areas as they only play well with iOS and Mac.
    thanks~ Rimi from

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Share This

Share This

Share this post with your friends!