Serious threats or harmless venting? Supreme court case tests boundaries of Facebook free speech
The ease of communication provided by social media like Facebook and Twitter is not always a good thing, especially when those sites are used to promote spousal abuse by posting threatening messages.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case next week that examines the difference between protected speech and harmful threats.
“Freedom of speech” is a broad term used to protect many forms of expression in the United States: art, music, newsprint, film, and just about anything else.
But there are limits to what the First Amendment allows. Threatening speech – specifically threats that would not be ignored by a reasonable person – is not protected by the First Amendment.
The problem is it can be hard to tell which threats are serious online and which are not.
The Case
Shortly after Tara Elonis was granted a Protection From Abuse (PFA) order against her husband, Anthony Elonis, she saw him post this message to Facebook: “Fold up your PFA and put it in your pocket. Is it thick enough to stop a bullet?”
His threats were worded in a prose rap style similar to rap musicians like Eminem, who himself has been the subject of controversy over his violent lyrics about women, especially his ex-wife, Kim.
Elonis made other threats in his “lyrics” against his former co-workers, local schools, and even an FBI agent sent to investigate his threats. The original court case disregarded his threats against his co-workers, but the threats against children, his wife, and the FBI agent were treated as serious.
Elonis ended up spending three years in jail for his threats.
True threat or blowing off steam?
The issue in question is whether Anthony Elonis’s threats could be considered real by a reasonable person or if they were clearly exaggerated expression.
His attorney, John Elwood, argued that the only difference between his client’s Facebook posts and Eminem’s rap lyrics is the rapper’s fame. According to Elwood, if Eminem “were still playing 250-seat gyms,” he would be indistinguishable from Elonis.
He argues that internet conversations lack social cues like body language and tone of voice to indicate that a threat is “serious or joking.”
Elwood noted that one of Elonis’s threats was “followed by an emoticon of a face with its tongue sticking out to indicate ‘jest.’”
A message from John Furrier, co-founder of SiliconANGLE:
Support our mission to keep content open and free by engaging with theCUBE community. Join theCUBE’s Alumni Trust Network, where technology leaders connect, share intelligence and create opportunities.
- 15M+ viewers of theCUBE videos, powering conversations across AI, cloud, cybersecurity and more
- 11.4k+ theCUBE alumni — Connect with more than 11,400 tech and business leaders shaping the future through a unique trusted-based network
Are you an AWS customer? Support SiliconANGLE financially by buying your AWS services from our Marketplace portal page and links: https://siliconangle.com/aws-marketplace/
About SiliconANGLE Media
SiliconANGLE Media is a recognized leader in digital media innovation, uniting breakthrough technology, strategic insights and real-time audience engagement. As the parent company of SiliconANGLE, theCUBE Network, theCUBE Research, CUBE365, theCUBE AI and theCUBE SuperStudios — with flagship locations in Silicon Valley and the New York Stock Exchange — SiliconANGLE Media operates at the intersection of media, technology and AI.
Founded by tech visionaries John Furrier and Dave Vellante, SiliconANGLE Media has built a dynamic ecosystem of industry-leading digital media brands that reach 15+ million elite tech professionals. Our new proprietary theCUBE AI Video Cloud is breaking ground in audience interaction, leveraging theCUBEai.com neural network to help technology companies make data-driven decisions and stay at the forefront of industry conversations.
