UPDATED 19:15 EDT / JUNE 01 2015

NEWS

Supreme Court overturns conviction of man who sent death threats through Facebook

The Supreme Court has reversed the conviction of a man accused of sending his death threats to his wife and others via Facebook, and the case has raised new questions about when online threats are harmless venting and when they are serious threats.

Anthony Elonis served several years in jail for posting violent threats – which he called rap lyrics – to Facebook. In one post he referenced his wife’s Protection From Abuse (PFA) order against him, saying, “Fold up your PFA and put it in your pocket. Is it thick enough to stop a bullet?”

Elonis’ attorney, John Elwood, compared the rap lyrics to those of Eminem, who had also made references to violence against his ex-wife. Elwood claimed that the only difference between his client and Eminem is fame, and Elonis’ lyrics were simply a harmless form of expression that were meant “in jest.”

The Supreme Court seems to have agreed that the threats were not serious, as it has overturned Elonis’ conviction.

“Federal criminal liability generally does not turn solely on the results of an act without considering the defendant’s mental state,” wrote Chief Justice John Roberts. “That understanding ‘took deep and early root in American soil’ and Congress left it intact here.”

While the conviction was overturned by an 8-1 majority, Roberts and the court gave no official explanation for what mental state qualified for a legitimate threat.

Justice Samuel Alito agreed with overturning the conviction, but he severely criticized the court for failing to provide a clear ruling on the matter of what classifies the right mental state, saying, “The Court’s disposition of this case is certain to cause confusion and serious problems. Attorneys and judges need to know which mental state is required for conviction […] This case squarely presents that issue, but the Court provides only a partial answer. This will have regrettable consequences.”

With online harassment becoming an increasingly contentious issue in social media thanks to repeated examples of threats and bullying, the Supreme Court’s decision to avoid taking a stance means the debates will continue, and it largely falls to the social networks like Facebook and Twitter to moderate their own platforms.

Because we all know that has worked so well so far.

Photo by WEBN-TV 

A message from John Furrier, co-founder of SiliconANGLE:

Your vote of support is important to us and it helps us keep the content FREE.

One click below supports our mission to provide free, deep, and relevant content.  

Join our community on YouTube

Join the community that includes more than 15,000 #CubeAlumni experts, including Amazon.com CEO Andy Jassy, Dell Technologies founder and CEO Michael Dell, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger, and many more luminaries and experts.

“TheCUBE is an important partner to the industry. You guys really are a part of our events and we really appreciate you coming and I know people appreciate the content you create as well” – Andy Jassy

THANK YOU