UPDATED 15:55 EST / JUNE 11 2009

Intel Thinks Microsoft Has to Die

image Robert Cringely has an interesting take today on the purchase of Wind by Intel. In essence, he is saying that Intel is gunning to take down MS with their purchase of Wind because Microsoft takes the lions share of profits from each Netbook purchase.

The problem with PC’s in general and netbooks in particular is that they aren’t very profitable for Intel campared to the good old days.  Microsoft makes more profit from every Windows PC sold than does the PC manufacturer and LOTS more profit than Intel makes despite its massively dominant market share in microprocessors.  And with Netbooks retailing under $400, compared to Microsoft Intel makes hardly any profit at all.  So Microsoft has to die.

Understandably, this take on things is intriguing, and it definitely caught my attention.  I took a look at the all the players involved as Cringely describes them, and by and large he’s got the big picture pretty well sewn up.  They’d like Android to continue to propagate out to devices that could carry their chipset on mobile computing devices, but also hope to hedge their bets on that concept by introducing Moblin to the mix.

I was talking to John Furrier about the whole ‘Intel gunning for Microsoft’ angle, and he had a somewhat unique take on it.

“If Windows is the bottleneck for this new Linux-based paradigm then that’s Microsoft’s fault not Intel’s gesture of competition,” said John. “The Google Android end of the equation is more an indicator that a more efficient, lower cost operating system (i.e., the cloud) is soon to arrive and Intel is making it’s bet on that market trend.”

In other words, the point that John’s making (and sounds more plausible to me) is that Intel (much like Microsoft is with Azure) is making the bet on the cloud, but image Microsoft isn’t moving fast enough for Intel. As a result, Intel is turning it’s lonely eyes toward Google.  It isn’t a matter of wanting Microsoft to die because they make more money than Intel – it’s a matter of following Intel’s vision of the future.

A vision of the future, incidentally, is something that Intel’s likely to have a much better grasp on than Microsoft.  Intel, as we talked about earlier in the week, works with developers (especially young developers) with a vengeance lately.  Working to build a community focused on improving that academic focus is part of what’s giving Intel this strategic edge.

It makes for an interesting and captivating drama to think that suddenly Intel has developed a deep-seated jealousy at the success Microsoft is enjoying over Netbooks. Ultimately, I think it’s less about the drama and more about Intel being in touch with the reality of where computing is headed.

[To Learn More About SiliconAngle Blog]


Since you’re here …

Show your support for our mission by our 1-click subscribe to our YouTube Channel (below) — The more subscribers we have the more then YouTube’s algorithm promotes our content to users interested in #EnterpriseTech.  Thank you.

Support Our Mission:    >>>>>>  SUBSCRIBE NOW >>>>>>  to our Youtube Channel

… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.

If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.