Bloomberg makes fresh Chinese spying claims as others cast doubt on story
Bloomberg made fresh claims in its ongoing China spy chips story today, while others continued to cast doubt on the veracity of the claims.
Bloomberg first published a report on Oct. 4 that claimed China had inserted tiny spying devices in various forms of technology such as data center servers, including those used by Amazon.com Inc. and Apple Inc. Today it went further and claimed that the same chips were discovered in hardware being used by a “major U.S. telecommunications company.”
The report referenced a security expert named Yossi Appleboum as providing the publication with documents, analysis and other evidence of the discovery. As was the case with the original allegations, the spy chips are alleged to have been found in hardware manufactured by Super Micro Computer Inc., a Taiwanese-American-founded information technology company based in San Jose, California.
Appleboum is quoted as saying he has seen similar manipulations of different vendors’ computer hardware made by contractors in China, not just products from Supermicro.
As with the original claims, which were denied by Apple, Amazon, the U.K. National Cyber Security Centre and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the new claims have been vehemently denied by all four major U.S. telcos — Sprint Corp., AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and T-Mobile US Inc. Motherboard, which reported the latest denials, said it best when it wrote that “no one is really sure who to believe.”
Bringing the original report into question further, hardware security expert Joe Fitzpatrick, who was both consulted with and quoted in the report, has said he believes Bloomberg manipulated what he said.
On the Risky Business podcast, Fitzpatrick said that he spent a lot of time explaining to Bloomberg how such attacks could, in principle, be carried out, but instead Bloomberg had parroted his theory as fact.
“What really struck me is that like all the details that were even remotely technical, seemed like they had been lifted from the conversations I had about theoretically how hardware implants work and how the devices I was making to show off at black hat two years ago worked,” Fitzpatrick said. “It was surprising to me that in a scenario where I would describe these things and then he would go and confirm these and 100 percent of what I described was confirmed by sources.”
Bloomberg has a reputation for solid reporting and wouldn’t normally publish a story unless they were entirely confident in it. But as Axios pointed out, “it’s hard to believe that Amazon, Apple and Supermicro are all fabricating their emphatic denials of the Bloomberg story.”
Someone is lying, or at least is mistaken, so the big question remains who.
Since you’re here …
Show your support for our mission with our one-click subscription to our YouTube channel (below). The more subscribers we have, the more YouTube will suggest relevant enterprise and emerging technology content to you. Thanks!
Support our mission: >>>>>> SUBSCRIBE NOW >>>>>> to our YouTube channel.
… We’d also like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.