Facebook in Hot Water Over Teens Usage of the “Like” Button as Advertising
The lawsuit hinges on the fact that advertisements, while shown to everyone, can also be “Liked.” A function of Facebook where if a user appreciates something and wants their friends to be aware of their appreciation they click a button marked “Like” near the item. In almost every case, clicking “Like” republishes that element in a message on the walls of networked friends—and, in the case of advertisements, the person who clicked “Like” becomes a vehicle for the exposure of that advertisement.
PR Newswire fills us in on the core of the lawsuit’s argument from a press release,
“When a teenager sees that their Facebook friends ‘Like’ an ad, it piques their curiosity, making them more likely to click the ad or visit the page,” says Los Angeles plaintiff attorney John Torjesen of John C. Torjesen & Associates. “We believe it is a clear case of exploitation of children for the sake of profits.”
“The consent of the minor for this commercial use of his or her name and likeness is not obtained by Facebook,” says plaintiff attorney and co-counsel Antony Stuart of Stuart Law Firm. “Under California law, the minor’s consent cannot be obtained without the consent of the parent or guardian. Facebook makes no effort to obtain parental consent.”
The California law seems to be aimed more at having a person’s picture taken by an advertiser and then posted without parents permission—not a minor distributing their own likeness, with their own words, through a social network on their own whim.
This seems a little bit of cyberculture shock to me, as the social upvote of clicking “Like” on an advertisement doesn’t seem all that removed from wearing a visibly branded piece of clothing or carrying around a laptop with a prominent brand. In its basic state, clicking “Like” is basically exactly like a person saying to a group of people, “Hey, I like this product, it’s interesting to me.” The advertisement’s distribution is inherent in the speech of the individual speaking and even teens have the right to speak about advertised products. The average teen is neither tricked nor unaware that clicking the “Like” button will tell all their friends about it; in fact, that’s the draw.
Still, this is a danger of the collision between participatory culture and marketing. If these sorts of lawsuits take a foothold, there will emerge more legal issues around social endorsements; bloggers, social network users (and the networks themselves) will eventually have to become more responsible for their brand-related actions and brands will have to consider different incentives and advertising methods as a result. However, it may also strike a dangerous blow against personal responsibility and free speech, even for minors.
The basis in law will probably hinge on the various uses of the tool. The “Like” button is an expression of personal choice, not just a commercial advertisement.
Since you’re here …
Show your support for our mission with our one-click subscription to our YouTube channel (below). The more subscribers we have, the more YouTube will suggest relevant enterprise and emerging technology content to you. Thanks!
Support our mission: >>>>>> SUBSCRIBE NOW >>>>>> to our YouTube channel.
… We’d also like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.