Epic Games lawsuit against Apple for alleged anti-competitive behavior finally comes to court
Epic Games Ltd.’s lawsuit against Apple Inc. over alleged anticompetitive behavior has finally come to court as Apple defended its control of its App Store.
Epic, perhaps best known as the creator of the popular battle game “Fortnite,” filed a lawsuit against Apple in August after “Fortnite” was removed from the Apple App Store as well as Google LLC’s Play Store.
“Fortnite” was removed after Epic added the ability in the iOS and Android versions to purchase in-game items directly from Epic itself. Both the Apple App Store and Google Play Store require all app purchases to be made through the respective store directly, with Apple and Google each taking a 30% cut.
The lawsuit from Epic argues that its inability to charge users directly, as it does with the desktop version of “Fortnite,” constitutes unfair competition.
In opening arguments, Epic argued that Apple purposely locks in its customers. Epics lawyers said that although “Epic is far from the only unhappy Apple developer and distributor,” it happened to be the one company that could “finally [say] enough to Apple’s monopolistic conduct” by “taking on the world’s largest company” in court over the matter, Ars Technica reported.
This opening argument from Epic was not unexpected. But the company also showed a slideshow that included a number of internal emails from Apple ecosystem partners detailing how it built a so-called “walled garden.”
The emails are fascinating in their own right and included emails from and between late Apple founder Steve Jobs, Senior Vice President of Software Engineering Craig Federighi, Chief Financial Officer Luca Maestri, Chief Executive Tim Cook, Senior Vice President of Internet Software and Services Eddy Cue and former Apple executive Scott Forstall. As 9to5Mac noted, the emails were chosen by Epic to illustrate the early decision-making that went into the creation of the App Store and its alleged anticompetitive nature from its inception.
Epic also argued that the claim from Apple that it strictly controls the App Store to create a secure and trusted place for user downloads is false, citing multiple examples of Apple being aware of scam applications and failing to act.
Not surprisingly, Apple disagreed with Epic’s arguments, claiming that it built the App Store and gets to set its own rules, which it said are designed to ensure that apps are high-quality and secure. “Epic wants us to be Android, but we don’t want to be,” Apple lawyer Karen Dunn said. “And our consumers don’t want that either. They want the choice.”
The Apple lawyers also pointed to Epic asking Apple for a special side deal from the company before launching its attack on Apple. Apple’s lawyers also argued that Epic is asking it to remove a layer of security from the iOS ecosystem that could put users at risk of compromise.
The court case is expected to last around three weeks.
Image: Epic Games
Since you’re here …
Show your support for our mission with our one-click subscription to our YouTube channel (below). The more subscribers we have, the more YouTube will suggest relevant enterprise and emerging technology content to you. Thanks!
Support our mission: >>>>>> SUBSCRIBE NOW >>>>>> to our YouTube channel.
… We’d also like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.