Is Sprint Hypocritcal on Spectrum Hoarding?
Large carriers like AT&T have frequently been accused of spectrum hoarding. In AT&T’s case, critics base their claims on the fact that the company has one of the largest holdings of spectrum of any wireless carrier. One of the is Sprint. Yet based on data from Bernstein Research, AT&T owns the fewest MHz of spectrum per million customers while Sprint/Clearwire has the most MHz per million customers. More precisely, Sprint (which owns most of Clearwire) has more than 4.3 times the spectrum per customer than AT&T, and they like it this way for a good reason.
Despite investors calling on Sprint to sell off Clearwire spectrum to boost shareholder value, Sprint seems eager to warehouse Clearwire spectrum to depress the stock value for an easier buyout of Clearwire. So rather than using that spectrum to build more wireless infrastructure, as was intended, or at least auction it off so that others may build more wireless infrastructure, Sprint would seems to be hoarding it for financial gain. That seems rather ironic. One of the key motivations for AT&T’s acquisition of T-Mobile is the desire for more spectrum, yet Sprint is holding onto excess spectrum while vocally opposing the merger.
[Cross-posted at High Tech Forum]
A message from John Furrier, co-founder of SiliconANGLE:
Your vote of support is important to us and it helps us keep the content FREE.
One click below supports our mission to provide free, deep, and relevant content.
Join our community on YouTube
Join the community that includes more than 15,000 #CubeAlumni experts, including Amazon.com CEO Andy Jassy, Dell Technologies founder and CEO Michael Dell, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger, and many more luminaries and experts.
THANK YOU