IBM’s acquisition of Red Hat has IT executives’ attention, but attitude is ‘wait and see’
Nine days into the third quarter of 2019, IBM Corp. closed its $34 billion acquisition of Red Hat Inc. Now that Red Hat is officially part of the IBM fold, what are the expectations of both companies by customers as the deal takes hold?
That was the central focus of a recent survey conducted by Enterprise Technology Research, which canvassed high-level enterprise technology users around the globe. One key finding was that this is viewed as less an attempt by IBM to climb into the cloud game and more as a prime opportunity to reboot its business services strategy.
“This is a services play, connecting OpenShift from Red Hat into the 80% of the installed base that is still on-premises, with workloads at the back end of mission-critical systems that need to be modernized,” said Dave Vellante, co-host of theCUBE, SiliconANGLE Media’s mobile livestreaming studio, at theCUBE’s studio in Boston. “That’s IBM’s opportunity.” (See the full discussion with transcript here.)
Better with Red Hat than without
The ETR survey found that more respondents were positive about the acquisition than negative. Yet, a vast majority (64%) were holding off judgment until they had an opportunity to see how IBM handled Red Hat and integrated its services into a coherent strategy.
“A majority said IBM is surely better off with Red Hat than without Red Hat in the context of cloud,” Vellante said. “Most information technology people are going to wait and see.”
In addition to benchmark data, the ETR survey also included written comments from those participating. Many of the comments validated statements by IBM Chief Executive Ginni Rometty, who has emphasized IBM’s focus on competing in hybrid cloud and multicloud computing.
“Clearly Red Hat gives IBM a better position to do this,” Vellante said. “Hybrid/multicloud is complex. IBM loves complexity, and its services organization is No. 1 in the industry.”
A potential issue over the acquisition is pricing. Some of the respondents expressed concern that IBM might attempt to increase subscription costs.
“IBM has a nasty habit when it buys companies, particularly software companies, to raise prices,” Vellante noted. “Financially, it’s clearly worked for IBM, but sometimes it ticks off customers.”
Here’s the complete video analysis, one of many CUBE Conversations from SiliconANGLE and theCUBE.
Since you’re here …
Show your support for our mission by our 1-click subscribe to our YouTube Channel (below) — The more subscribers we have the more then YouTube’s algorithm promotes our content to users interested in #EnterpriseTech. Thank you.
Support Our Mission: >>>>>> SUBSCRIBE NOW >>>>>> to our Youtube Channel
… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.