Blaming Qualcomm, Intel reveals it took multibillion-dollar loss on modem unit sale
Intel Corp. took a swipe at Qualcomm Inc. in a court filing today, blaming the company’s controversial business practices for forcing it to exit the mobile modem market.
Intel sold its mobile chip unit, related intellectual property and equipment to Apple Inc. in July for $1 billion. The transaction came shortly after the iPhone maker struck a chip supply deal with Qualcomm to use its competing silicon in future devices. Apple had previously brought some of the modems powering its handsets from Intel, including the modem that ships inside the latest iPhone 11.
The chipmaker said in the court briefing today that it sold the mobile modem unit to Apple at “a multibillion-dollar loss” compared with how much it had invested to build up the business. Intel filed the brief with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in a bid to lend its support to an antitrust lawsuit the Federal Trade Commission is pursuing against Qulacomm.
The FTC scored a major victory in May when a U.S. District Court found some of Qualcomm’s business practices violate competition laws. Judge Lucy Koh ruled that the chipmaker charges “unreasonably high” fees from handset makers such as Apple and ordered the company to make a series of major changes to how it sells its technology. The decision mandated, among other things, that Qualcomm end its practice of requiring customers to buy expensive patent licenses as part of chip deals.
Intel General Counsel Steven Rodgers fleshed out the company’s position in a blog post that accompanied the court brief. “Intel fought for nearly a decade to build a profitable modem chip business,” he wrote. “We invested billions, hired thousands, acquired two companies and built innovative world-class products that eventually made their way into Apple’s industry-leading iPhones, including the most recently released iPhone 11. But when all was said and done, Intel could not overcome the artificial and insurmountable barriers to fair competition created by Qualcomm’s scheme and was forced to exit the market this year.”
Intel is not the first chipmaker to have accused Qualcomm of forcing it to exit a contested market segment. Previously, Icera Inc. filing a lawsuit charging that the company had used unfair tactics to shut out rivals from 3G baseband chip deals and reduce competition. The European Union hit Qualcomm with a a 242 million-euro fine this year after an investigation upheld Icera’s arguments.
The FTC’s antitrust suit against Qualcomm is expected to go before the 9th Circuit in January.
Since you’re here …
Show your support for our mission with our one-click subscription to our YouTube channel (below). The more subscribers we have, the more YouTube will suggest relevant enterprise and emerging technology content to you. Thanks!
Support our mission: >>>>>> SUBSCRIBE NOW >>>>>> to our YouTube channel.
… We’d also like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.