If you read the news about him, Kim Dotcom sounds larger than life. He has a reputation of a sleazebag with too much money to his name who became the center of a year-long-firestorm involving his website Megaupload. It’s now been over a year since the US violently dismantled his cloud cyberlocker file sharing business in an action that also led to his arrest by heavily armed authorities.
Mega, dubbed “The Privacy Company,” launched with so much fanfare that the influx of over one million new users in its first day caused vast instability in the system. The simple fact that the US caused the destruction of MegaUpload a year ago has been more than enough advertising to give Dotcom a platform to launch his new cloud locker service. In short, the attack on Dotcom has generated a billionaire underdog who appears to be holding his own against charges of piracy and wrongdoing.
The US government made Dotcom into something of a folk hero with its overbearing and catastrophic overreaction to his business model. As the trial winds on, all eyes are on Dotcom and the Megaupload debacle wondering what the outcome will bring for cloud-based services that sell themselves to consumers because all of them could be used for piracy (in the same way Megaupload would have been.) In fact, during the first months after the takedown of Megaupload a cold wind blew through the cloud locker ecology withering many projects right off the vine.
A focus on strong encryption and it certainly doesn’t look like vaporware
As I said above, Mega is being sold to potential customers as “The Privacy Company” and to do this the company’s technical docs appear to state that they’re using monster encryption. Not only are files uploaded by users protected using a giant 2048-bit RSA key, passwords are hashed with AES-128, and everything is stored using a block-encryption system.
Basically: Mega wants to look like the Fort Knox of encryption. They’re not doing too bad of a job either.
Many of us in the cyptography world expected something similar to arrive from Dotcom’s empire, but most of us thought the Mega itself would be vaporware (or at least year’s off.) It’s unknown how much of the actual implementation fits with what the Mega documents say, but while the encryption mentioned may be quite strong, it doesn’t come without some potential pitfalls and might have benefitted from a few more months of planning.
It’s being hotly debated right now on Hacker News and even in an Ars Technica article about how strong the encryption can be (even with a hulking 2048-bit key) if Mega works the way that it does.
First, when the monster key is being generated at very beginning of the user session the system seems to suggest that it’s collecting (or collected?) entropy for the keys. This means that random information is being pulled in from somewhere to help make the encryption key more random. The status of generating randomness for cryptography keys right now is iffy because computers don’t actually do random: they need to look out into the world for that. Usually this is done by generating values from mouse movements or keyboard strokes by the user. However, it’s hard to tell how Mega is pulling in this extra randomness.
Second, like Megaupload it seems like it’ll be attempting to save space by consolidating bits of files—or deduplication—which should be next-to-impossible of every file uploaded by a user happens to be encrypted from the jump. In order to deduplicate something about the internal nature of the files must be known to Mega after the encryption so that during the addition of a new file or at a later date duplicate files could be linked to save space.
As the launch wears on, more issues will probably keep cropping up, but the language of the technical docs looks like it’s trying very hard to show that the system itself is highly secure and for the most part unaware of the content uploaded.
This “content agnostic” approach also gives Mega an out if they were to face future scrutiny by the US government and copyright cartel forces who are certainly champing at the bit to take another bite at Mega; although the US might be smarting after the severe drubbing they’ve taken in the global legal arena over the overzealous takedown of Megaupload. If Mega is largely unaware of what’s uploaded to their system due to the strong encryption, then authorities cannot claim that Mega is liable for what was uploaded.
It’s obvious that Mega was developed with the intent to give the proverbial middle finger to Dotcom’s legal detractors, place the power to control privacy in users’ own hands, and recreate most of what was lost with Megaupload. Include the fact that part of Dotcom’s “release instructions” was that he wouldn’t launch another service similar to Megaupload–although Mega does something quite like the now-defunct business, it is certainly a totally different beast and updated for a more discerning private user.
It’ll have to work first before anyone gets to really steam Mega’s encrypted noodles
Mega’s obvious work to protect the privacy of their customers while at the same time give a big middle finger to the US government and copyright interests that might want to take down the project yet again may be good and interesting, but right now the system doesn’t work for everyone. The giant influx of over a million users has led to a great deal of instability.
This morning, I finally successfully uploaded a file; but I still cannot download it even after an hour of waiting for it to finish being added to the system. (It’s the first draft of this article in fact.)
After that, it will be a whole new ballgame as we all watch and wait for the copyright industry to regroup and potentially go after Dotcom again. The dramatic downfall of Megaupload has fueled this amazing interest in Mega and as this fire burns bright, hopefully it will also warm the hoarfrost that’s been growing on cloud cyberlocker services for over a year and potentially it also means that those that start to return will also sport and focus on encryption.
Even services such as DropBox have seen increased speculation and scrutiny over their encryption and privacy practices with potential probes in 2011 and their updated terms of service. Now, more than ever, people who use the Internet are beginning to realize that what they put online can become meat for boogeymen like Anonymous, unscrupulous governments, or even simply malicious rivals and they want to be certain that the consumer-level cyberlocker services they’re using are up to the task of protecting their files.
Good luck, Mega, the cryptography and cybersecurity communities are watching—not to mention much of the cloud-based cyberlocker market.
Latest posts by Kyt Dotson (see all)
- QuickBooks Online drives developer outreach to fuel global growth - October 25, 2016
- Chinese firm to recall webcams after Friday’s massive cyber attack - October 24, 2016
- Onchain joins with Alibaba for blockchain-powered email evidence bank - October 20, 2016