UPDATED 15:56 EDT / NOVEMBER 15 2019

supreme-court-546279_960_720-768x500 POLICY

Decade-long Google-Oracle copyright dispute heads to US Supreme Court

A closely watched copyright dispute in which Oracle Corp. is seeking billions of dollars in damages from Google LLC will move up to the U.S. Supreme Court, adding yet another chapter to a decade-long legal saga.

The case, which the court accepted today, revolves around the Java programming  language. Oracle obtained the rights to the language through its 2010 acquisition of Sun Microsystems Inc. for $7.4 billion. Sun had filed suit against Google the year before and the database maker moved to continue the case after the takeover closed with an expanded set of claims. 

At issue is the way Google used Java in Android. When the original suit was filed by Sun, the mobile operating system had contained 11,500 lines of code from the Java application programming interface. The database maker argues that this copying constituted a copyright violation while the Alphabet Inc. subsidiary posits it was legal under the fair-use doctrine.

A number of prominent tech firms and industry bodies have come out on Google’s side. So did two lower courts during the earlier stages of the litigation, but last year, Federal Circuit panel handed a victory to Oracle in a development that prompted the search giant to appeal to the Supreme Court.

There’s a lot at stake. Oracle is demanding damages of $8.8 billion from Google, a sum that dwarfs the current $1.3 billion record for a copyright infringement case, in which Oracle was also the plaintiff. Moreover, a favorable Supreme Court ruling for the database maker could have financial implications for many uninvolved companies as well.

Borrowing API components from other applications is a fairly common practice in development projects and countless programs feature copied snippets. If the Supreme Court rules that APIs are copyrightable, code that is free to use today could suddenly be subject to license restrictions. Some organizations may find themselves owing fees for applications built years prior, while others could face the risk of being served intellectual property infringement suits.

“This will likely be one of the most seminal copyright cases in at least a generation, if not longer,” said Michael Keyes, a partner at law firm Dorsey & Whitney LP specializing in intellectual property. “An issue that is not directly before the Court but will be implicated is the issue of damages. If Google is ultimately liable for infringement, the damages claim could well be into billions of dollars. It’s a massive sum that underscores what is at stake and the importance of the issues.”

Photo: Pixabay

Since you’re here …

Show your support for our mission with our one-click subscription to our YouTube channel (below). The more subscribers we have, the more YouTube will suggest relevant enterprise and emerging technology content to you. Thanks!

Support our mission:    >>>>>>  SUBSCRIBE NOW >>>>>>  to our YouTube channel.

… We’d also like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.

If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.